Before the Sanhedrin

Acts 22:30-23:11

After the scene in the torture chamber, the Roman commander must have gone to the Roman tribune, for he then summons the Sanhedrin into session and takes Paul before them in an effort to discover what Paul was being accused of. In spite of their brutality, it is difficult to accuse the Romans of being anything other than cunning in this scene, for their tactics have shifted in a fascinating way; they are now defending their citizen in a sense, and shifting the responsibility for the mob violence from the victim of the mob to the leaders of the people who had committed the violence. Remember that Luke has not mentioned that the Sanhedrin was behind the mob’s actions; it was some “Jews from Asia” who incited the crowd… Now, the Sanhedrin needs to give an account…

Paul begins his defense in 23:1. Isn’t that interesting; he hasn’t been accused of anything, in fact, the purpose of the meeting is to discover what the accusations are. Essentially, Paul makes a statement that in everything he has done; he has been a faithful servant of God.

Ananias became the high priest in 47 AD, and he was known to be extremely corrupt, according to the Jewish historian Josephus. When Ananias heard Paul’s statement, he ordered him struck in the mouth, in violation of the Law (Lev. 19:15):

“God will strike you, you whitewashed wall! You sit there to judge me according to the law, yet you yourself violate the law by commanding that I be struck!” (23:3)

Everyone was shocked that Paul would speak to the high priest in such a manner:

Those who were standing near Paul said, “How dare you insult God’s high priest!”

Paul replied, “Brothers, I did not realize that he was the high priest; for it is written: ‘Do not speak evil about the ruler of your people.’” (23:4-5)

Interesting response from Paul; did he really not know he was addressing the high priest, dressed as he was in his judge’s costume, seated in the high priest’s special chair? We know Paul’s eyesight was poor, but did he really not know?

Three years ago I was a witness in a court case. I am legally blind, and I could not see the judge from where I was giving testimony, but when the judge asked me a question, I could hear where the voice had come from and I could tell that it wasn’t the attorney who was asking; I couldn’t see the attorney either, but I could tell. I don’t believe for a second that Paul didn’t know whom he was addressing… but no one would have known he was the high priest by his actions, since he was violating the law he was there to enforce, and thus I would have to suggest that Paul spoke with irony in this instance. Paul got one pop in the mouth, the high priest got two.

OK, the first part of the story is funny; the next part is hilarious…

In 23:6-10 we read that all Paul needed to do at this point is to say he had been attacked because he taught about the resurrection, and the Pharisees and Sadducees were at others’ throats. Nobody accused Paul of anything, and the Romans had to take Paul out of the now chaotic room by force… The scene ends with 23:11:

The following night the Lord stood near Paul and said, “Take courage! As you have testified about me in Jerusalem, so you must also testify in Rome.”

A few posts back we saw that Paul had been led by the Holy Spirit to go to Jerusalem, and that the same Holy Spirit had been warning others that he would have a rough time of it when he got there, that he would be bound by the Jews and handed over to the Gentiles, giving us a riddle: What was going on here, isn’t that a contradiction? This is the answer to the riddle; Paul would take the Gospel to the very heart of the Roman Empire as a result of this chain of events.


About Don Merritt

A long time teacher and writer, Don hopes to share his varied life's experiences in a different way with a Christian perspective.
This entry was posted in Bible and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Before the Sanhedrin

  1. When I was writing my historical novel on the life of Paul, I realized most high priests only kept their office for one to three years. Caiaphas was the exception. Paul had been gone from Jerusalem many years working with Gentiles

    18–36 AD – Caiaphas (died shortly after)
    37 AD only – Jonathan (murdered by Felix)
    37-41 AD – Theophilus
    43 AD only – Matthias
    44 AD only – Jonathan (again)
    47-58 AD – Ananias (tried Paul)

    63 AD only – Ananus Jr.
    63-64 AD – Joshua (Gamaliel’s son)

    But, you may be right; Paul probably had poor eye sight and that was why.

  2. paulfg says:

    Two posts or so ago, you caught my interest and I jumped into Biblegateway and read to the end of Acts in one sitting. I forgive you being the cause of this unforgiveable impatience! Yet I was swept along with the adventure. And yet (!) …

    We are talking “persecution” … we are talking “death sentence” stuff … we are talking brutality and man’s inhumanity to man (all in the name of God) … and yet (!) finding the whole thing hilarious!
    I wonder if we need a similar sense of humour today – a similar sense of God – a similar sense of hope.

    Please keep writing – you give my soul an infusion of God each time you do.

    • Don Merritt says:

      This is one of the nicest compliments I’ve ever received; thank you Paul. I may well be mistaken, but it seems to me that seeing the pure comedy in certain situations makes it so much easier to strip away the acting jobs and reveal the magnitude of the corruption and hypocrisy in certain situations, both then and now. Let’s face it, High Priest Ananias was a parody of high priest in this scene; if I were to make a video, I’d want Lucille Ball to play the part 🙂

      • paulfg says:

        That would be some video! Imagine the reaction from all the religious pressure groups! BUT – this approach has caused me to think a lot deeper. Thank you.

        (and thank you for your comment)

  3. Wally Fry says:

    So, perhaps Paul was being rather sarcastic? Interesting.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s